Analyse the uploaded patent filing materials as a structured legal review and risk run.

Focus on:
- claim clarity and ambiguity
- internal inconsistency between claims and specification
- terminology drift
- support gaps for claim elements
- weak support or overbreadth signals
- interpretation pressure points
- if prior art is included: likely novelty or obviousness pressure points
- if prosecution material is included: the strongest weaknesses, unresolved issues, and missing support in the current position

Separate clearly:
- text-grounded observations
- inferred risks
- missing inputs

Do not invent statutes, cases, or final patentability conclusions beyond the supplied material and cited references.
Do not present legal advice as certainty.

End with:
- executive summary
- highest-risk issues
- strongest support gaps
- most important missing inputs
- best next review questions